Hello Everyone,
I've been doing some reading and have very much enjoyed it. I have a question for Tim (or anyone who may like to respond).
In the conclusion of "The Future of Dispensationalism" I noticed you addressed Preterism directly but not Partial Preterism. Most Covenant theologians and Reformed brothers I know are PP in that, among other things, they hold to a physical Second Coming of the Lord to rule His Kingdom and would not deny a Resurrection. Maybe it's just me but there seem to be more PP out there than Preterists.
So I'm wondering why you chose not to address PP in your paper. I can see how both P & PP could end up in Apostasy and I consider PP more dangerous in that light, as PP can easily get involved with other large movements in building and/or preparing the Kingdom here on earth, so it will be 'fit' for the Lord's return.
God Bless.
I've been doing some reading and have very much enjoyed it. I have a question for Tim (or anyone who may like to respond).
In the conclusion of "The Future of Dispensationalism" I noticed you addressed Preterism directly but not Partial Preterism. Most Covenant theologians and Reformed brothers I know are PP in that, among other things, they hold to a physical Second Coming of the Lord to rule His Kingdom and would not deny a Resurrection. Maybe it's just me but there seem to be more PP out there than Preterists.
So I'm wondering why you chose not to address PP in your paper. I can see how both P & PP could end up in Apostasy and I consider PP more dangerous in that light, as PP can easily get involved with other large movements in building and/or preparing the Kingdom here on earth, so it will be 'fit' for the Lord's return.
God Bless.
