Here is a link to Tim's audio sermons, which thus far are very good. You should give them a listen.
http://www.oasischristianchurch.org/audio.html
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
DayOfTheLord |
Tim's Audio Sermons |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 1480 (05/20/08 04:59:29) |
Hello Everyone,
Here is a link to Tim's audio sermons, which thus far are very good. You should give them a listen. http://www.oasischristianchurch.org/audio.html
Last Edited By: DayOfTheLord 10/04/08 05:16:19.
Edited 2 times.
|
||
rhawes73 |
re: Tim's Audio Sermons | ||
|
Posts: 5 (05/20/08 18:40:43) |
Thanks so much for posting these! I listened to all three available sermons tonight and really enjoyed them.
The topics of seeking Christ's kingdom first and following His commandments have really been pressing on my mind lately, so these discussions are very timely for me. Indeed, I believe that the most significant problem with the church today is that Christians have gotten so caught up in following the teachings and methods of men (specifically these cults of personality in evangelicalism), and living for temporal things, that they've forgotten their obligation to follow Christ and seek the kingdom first. I'm reminded of how Peter was able to walk on the water until he took his eyes off of Christ, after which he began to sink. In John 21, Peter, who has just been told that he will die a martyr's death, asks about what will happen to John. In response, Jesus simply says: "What is that to you? Follow me." That's really the heart of the Christian life right there in a nutshell. "Follow me." I look forward to more! Also...thanks for including the music. Unfortunately, the church I presently attend has gone over to using praise music almost exclusively, and I really miss hymns. I have no problem with praise music itself (I'm also fond of Southern Gospel), but nothing compares to the old hymns of the church. - Robert John 16:33 - "These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world."
Last Edited By: rhawes73
05/20/08 18:42:59.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
jiminc |
|||
|
Posts: 64 (06/28/08 11:06:06) |
Hi all,
Just a note to say how much I'm enjoying Tim's podcasts. If you aren't listening, you're missing some great teaching. Thanks Tim for providing this valuable instruction. I pray God blesses you mightily as your ministry expands. Roger, you might consider a forum category for comments/questions on these teachings. In Christ, Jim |
||
Roger |
|||
|
Posts: 1252 (10/03/08 10:37:12) PFRS Administrator |
Brian,
Why are you in the process of editing / deleting posts that are five months old? I do not approve of this. If there is an explanation I would be happy to listen. But I can't allow threads to be distorted this way. Consequently, I am temporarily blocking your access. I would like to discuss it with you because I don't want to ban you. Please respond to my email. rogersamsel@yahoo.com |
||
Roger |
|||
|
Posts: 1253 (10/03/08 17:02:54) PFRS Administrator |
Brian,
I have restored your access. Please restore the original text of the opening post. You are free to add another post to the end exlaining that you no longer endorse the sermons or whatever. But please don't edit or delete old posts as this creates confusion. The edit feature should only be used within the first couple of hours or so. Thanks, Roger |
||
DayOfTheLord |
|||
|
Posts: 1539 (10/04/08 05:31:42) |
UPDATE:
I can no longer recommend these audio sermons as they contain serious theological errors, gaps, distortions and the like, IMHO. I've been listening to them over the months, and have become growingly concerned with their content. Your mileage with them may vary. This is only to assert that I no longer give them my recommendation, for the above stated reasons, if you enjoy them and wish to continue the conversation, please do. Brian |
||
rhawes73 |
re: Tim's Audio Sermons | ||
|
Posts: 31 (10/04/08 07:37:33) |
Brian,
Could you provide an example or two of what you think are theological errors in the sermons? I'm not disputing your right to your opinion; I'm just genuinely curious. I haven't noticed any errors. - Robert |
||
Roger |
|||
|
Posts: 1254 (10/04/08 07:40:06) PFRS Administrator |
DayOfTheLord wrote: Brian, Since you are making vague, non-specific charges, to which no can can respond, I will offer my own observations. Over the last five months (from the time when you were enthusiastic about recommending Tim's sermons), Tim has not changed; you have changed. And as far as I know, the only issue on which you have changed is pacifism. Now because of that one issue, suddenly all you can see at PFRS is "serious theological errors, gaps, distortions and the like"? On the contrary, what I have seen from you and other pacifists is that you have become so committed to your issue that you are blind to all Scriptural and historical evidence that refutes it. You have made reckless accusations. As far as I am concerned, you have become cultic in your thinking. Roger |
||
Tim |
|||
|
Posts: 1545 (10/04/08 12:38:10) Guest |
Brian,
Roger is right in that YOU are the one who has changed, not me. No doubt you don't like my preaching regarding the Sermon on the Mount, because I do not interpret Jesus' words in a vacuum, and claim that He taught extreme pacificism (as you have now embraced). That's fine. We'll manage without your endorsement. But you ought to be upfront and also admit that you are rejecting the principles on which PFRS is based. At least I am being consistent with our stated principles. And I assure you, if you consistently follow the principles that you are now using, you will also be adopting more error and rejecting more truth. One's views on this subject, and His Christian life, ought to be an accurate representation of God's character. Otherwise, you are misrepresenting Him. I'd like to see you keep "turning the other cheek" when your kids defy you. After raising a few teenagers, you will have a far different understanding of Jesus' words, and how they are to be used with wisdom, and under what circumstances. God is not only a God of mercy. He is also a God of justice. And if your theology is heavily skewed towards justice or mercy at the expense of the other, then you are misrepresenting Him. It is true with parenting. And it is true in the Christian life. I think your pacifist view is as extreme and dangerous as those in the early Church who put "martyrdom" on the same pedistal that you are putting "pacificism." Tim |
||
rhawes73 |
Math from the new Prophecy Series | ||
|
Posts: 35 (10/09/08 11:16:59) |
Tim,
When you have a moment, could you post the math portion of the lesson you just did on prophecy? I checked the Notes section of "Introduction II" on the Answers in Revelation site, but I don't see anything there right now. If I'm figuring this right (I'm no math wizard), the general time frame would be: From Adam's creation: 4004 + 2008 = 6012 yrs From the birth of Seth: 3874 + 2008 = 5882 yrs This leaves us with a difference of 130 years (the time from Adam to Seth). How do we narrow this down further? I heard you mention taking off a certain amount of time for every generation, but I haven't come across anyone who has done that on the net. I've just run a few searches though, so that doesn't mean anything. According to the Jewish calendar, this is the year 5769, but I don't know all of the intricacies involved in their calendar, so I'm not sure how that really works out. I honestly don't think we have 200+ years left. World events make think it must be much closer than that, maybe not even 50 years distant. - Robert
Last Edited By: rhawes73
10/09/08 11:25:27.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
Tim |
|||
|
Posts: 1548 (10/09/08 12:55:56) Guest |
Robert,
The countdown for the 6000 years is from the Fall and expulsion from Eden, not Creation. The possible time window is from day one of Eve's creation (not very likely) to roughly Adam's 110th year. Cain and Able were born after the fall. Yet, Cain and Abel were men (at least 20) when Abel was killed, because they were farmers and ranchers. Seth was born afer Abel was killed. Therefore, the Fall and expulsion from Eden could not have occurred less than 20 years before Seth's birth. So, subtract 20 from Adam's age when Seth was born, and you have 110. That means the Fall and expulsion from Eden could not have occurred any later than 110 years from Creation. However, it is likely that Adam and Eve enjoyed Eden for some time, perhaps several decades, prior to the Fall. And, it is possible that Abel was older than 20 years when he was murdered. In both cases, this would make the Fall earlier, and make the limit earlier. The bottom line is this: The fall could not have occurred BEFORE the creation of Eve. And it could not have occurred after Cain and Abel's birth. That leaves a 110 year period, with the likelyhood that the Fall took place learlier, rather than later, in this period. When we add the 6000 years to it, the window of time when the 6000 years will expire is from 1996 to 2106, assuming Ussher's dates to be correct. Tim
Last Edited By: Tim
10/09/08 12:59:21.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
rhawes73 |
re: timeframe for the second coming | ||
|
Posts: 36 (10/09/08 13:22:55) |
Thanks. I started with that 4004 date because I thought that it was possible for Adam to have sinned not long after his fall (maybe the same year as he was
created, although this is not likely). He probably did walk with God there for awhile before he fell, but I thought I'd look at that as the most extreme
date in order to calculate the full window.
- Robert edit -- I just had a thought about Adam's correlation to Christ: the "second Adam." This is complete, total and utter speculation, but Jesus is supposed to have died when he was about 33 years of age. I wonder if Adam might have sinned at about the same age? I guess it depends upon just how closely Jesus parallels Adam (physical death paralleling spiritual death?). Thinking a little more on this...Jesus rose 3 days after his death, and then remained for 40 days before ascending. From the speculation I've seen, it was about 10 days between the ascension and Pentecost, making a total of 53 days following Jesus' death until the birth of the church. Now, if we view the birth of the church as parallel to the birth of Cain (and view the days in terms of years), we would add 33 to 53 and get 80. So if there is anything to this parallelism, Cain might have been born to Adam when Adam was about 80 years old. This fits well within the figure of 110 years that you provided. Again, this is all assuming I'm not taking the parallelism too far. But if you do the math from here, the numbers become interesting indeed: If Adam was created in 4004 and sinned when he was 33, then he sinned (and the 6000 year countdown began) in the year 3971. Add 2008 to that and you get 5979. Subtract this from 6000 and you get 21 years until the beginning of the 7th millennium (2029). Subtract 7 years to account for Daniel's 70th Week and the week would begin in 2022. If, however, you assume that Christ was actually born in 3 or 4 BC, as most scholars seem to think, the numbers change a bit. If you assume 4004 to 4 BC, then the beginning of the 70th Week would fall in 2018 and the second coming in 2025. So, pure speculation, but interesting, nonetheless.
Last Edited By: rhawes73
10/09/08 14:26:30.
Edited 4 times.
|
||
Tim |
|||
|
Posts: 1549 (10/09/08 19:04:12) Guest |
Robert,
I too have played with the scenario - comparing the 1st and 2nd Adam, and Adam's age at the fall with Christ's age during His public ministry. But, I am not comfortable dealing with speculative matters like this, or presenting any particular date. It is too easy to make a mistake and lead people astray. On another note, you should know that the date of the crucifixion of Christ has been well established, by Dr. Floyd Nolan Jones, to be Friday, Nisan 15, AD 30. Ussher's AD 33 date is in error. Jesus was born in 4 BC. His baptism was in AD 27. You should purchase his book, "The Chronology of the Old Testament." One more point. When Cain was confronted by God for having killed Abel, He was concerned with being killed by anyone who finds him. That would imply that Adam and Eve had other sons and daughters between Cain and Seth. True, Seth was given in place of Abel. But, that was only because Abel was the first person to die. That Seth replaced the dead son in no way implies that he was the NEXT one born, only that he was the first son born after Abel's death. And we have no idea how old Abel was at his death. It could have been much more than 20. It seems to me that their might have been several other siblings prior to Seth. In the geneology, we clearly have many other sons and daughters of Adam. That being the case, it is likely there is some considerable time between the births of Cain and Abel and the 130 date of the birth of Seth, perhaps several decades. This would tend to push the window limit that we are talking about back much closer to our time, making it much more likely that the second coming will be in our lifetimes (perhaps before the middle of this century). Tim
Last Edited By: Tim
10/09/08 19:58:24.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
rhawes73 |
|||
|
Posts: 37 (10/10/08 08:38:13) |
Thanks for the additional info, Tim.
I understand and agree with what you said about potentially leading people astray with too much speculation. It's interesting to play with theories but we can't base too much on what we don't know. Christ gave us the signs He wants us to look for, and the instructions for what He wants us to do in the meantime; that is what is most important. |
||
Tim |
|||
|
Posts: 1550 (10/10/08 09:14:20) Guest |
Robert, I think He will provide the necessary information at the proper time. Too much information about the future is dangerous, because people get scared and do irrational things. God wants us to rely on him to get us through whatever may come. So, I trust that when the time comes, we will know, if we are truely hearing His voice. Tim |
||
rhawes73 |
Yesterday's Sermon | ||
|
Posts: 76 (01/19/09 19:43:30) |
Thanks very, very much for yesterday's sermon, Tim. It was gutsy, and very much needed; it should have been heard far and wide.
I've found myself saying much the same thing over the last few years. It astonishes me that Christians feel a need to support Israel in absolutely everything it does when 1) Israel is apostate, and 2) the Bible reveals that it had an extremely poor record of following after God's will even during its heyday. There is absolutely no reason to believe that, simply because Israel wants something, God is on their side in that matter. Nor should we be trying to "usher in the kingdom." God will see His will fulfilled in His own good time, just as He brought His Son forth in the "fullness of time." Also, this hardline, unqualified support for Israel among U.S. Christians has had the effect of hardening our view of Arabs to the point of hatred. I think that many Christians, and some Christian leaders, take real pleasure in seeing Arab communities bombed and embargoed. I've seen a real callousness in that area (Christians talking about "socking it to the 'ragheads,'" etc.), and it cannot possibly be pleasing to God to see his people take pleasure in the sufferings of others for whom Christ died, no matter how different they are or what their governments might have done. Your point about Christians needing to concenrate less on politics and more on sharing the gospel was dead-on. In my own circles, I've felt like a voice crying in the wilderness on this issue. And while your point concentrated on foreign policy, I think it also applies domestically. Christians have embraced the state and are actively using it to try and force their values down the throats of unbelievers. This has had a two-fold effect: 1) it has legitimized the state's increasing power, including its increasing interference in the family, education, and other social matters, and 2) it has weakened the church by de-emphasizing the life-changing power of the gospel and by making Christians appear as tyrants in the view of unbelievers. I can't find one single admonition on the part of Jesus or the apostles to the effect that we have some duty to impose our political preferences on others, but this has become almost an obsession in the church today. Indeed, when asked to judge between two men, Jesus (who could have rightly judged) asked: "Man, who made me a judge over you?" (Luke 12:14) Are the servants greater than the master? What gives us the right to tell others how to live when Jesus Himself refused to do so? Unfortunately, it's difficult to raise such points in evangelical circles without being burned in effigy. And meanwhile, we're reaping the whirlwind in both areas as we lose control of our families while fighting for control of Washington, and as unbelievers grow hard toward the gospel because they find Jesus' followers to be so offensive. Anyway, I didn't start off to write this much. I just wanted to express my appreciation. You had at least one voice in the amen corner. - Robert |
||
Tim |
|||
|
Posts: 1578 (01/20/09 17:28:19) Guest |
Hi Robert,
I appreciate the kudos. I think Christian involvement in politics is about t change dramatically. This last election has been a turning point, IMO. The "culture war" has been lost by Christians. And I don't see things turning around. I think we have passed the "point of no return." And Christians who continue to try to change the culture through political means are going to be ground up and spit out by the political machine. American Christianity's survival will depend on our getting back to our real mission. I also think that there are difficult days ahead for Christians who will not compromise with apostasy. Persecution is coming. But, persecution purifies. And that's what we need. Tim |
||
rhawes73 |
|||
|
Posts: 77 (01/21/09 12:33:36) |
I agree that we've passed the point of no return and will likely see persecution begin in the near future, probably starting with expanded
"hate-crimes" laws such as are already in effect in Europe and Canada. Private schooling (including home schooling) is also going to come under
fire, most likely in the form of regulations that will make it difficult, if not impossible, to operate legally.
We have hard choices ahead of us. Fortunately, even if we don't know all the details, we know how it turns out in the end. - Robert |
||
rhawes73 |
|||
|
Posts: 78 (02/18/09 12:53:03) |
Tim,
I went to listen to last Sunday's sermon and found that the audio skips around a lot, making it impossible to listen to all but about 10 minutes worth (music and message both). Is that a problem with the recording, or maybe just the upload? Robert
Last Edited By: rhawes73
02/18/09 13:00:42.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
Tim |
|||
|
Posts: 1579 (02/26/09 13:00:32) Guest |
Robert,
I tried uploading the sermon again. Try it now. Tim |
||
rhawes73 |
|||
|
Posts: 79 (03/03/09 17:42:59) |
Thanks, Tim. I tried listening again and it worked fine that time.
Also, congratulations on the new families at Oasis. That's a remarkable growth spurt! I hope they contribute much to the ministry. - Robert |
||